Election
news
The upcoming election is one of the most important issues to discuss.
This is not an election you can afford to not vote in because you don't
like either candidate. This is not an election you can vote third party in
because you don't like either candidate. A third party vote or abstaining
from voting is a vote for Hillary; make no mistake about it.
Who wins this election will determine not only your future but if the
United States will rebound or be completely decimated and annihilated.
This is a cabal/establishment/media driven election. It's war against
we
the people.
If
you are not familiar with Ambassador William Mount, go to
www.youtube.com and type in William Mount and watch some of his
videos to get caught up on exactly what is at stake here. Whistleblower
extreme; why he is still alive baffles me. He has high up connections
and tells the truth. I have followed him for some time now.
Start at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bz5MjYPUZQ
He tells just why this election is the
most critical we have ever had.
Are you
aware a Hillary presidency means a nuclear war with Russia , China
and Iran? Here is a video in which she flat out bluntly explains if she becomes
president she will nuke Iran. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8rMtIcVdk8
Here's another: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9nt9xMNniY
We will pay a huge price for that. Obama has made sure Iran has the money and
capability to obliterate Israel whom Obama hates. As you are aware Obama
doesn't work for us. He has been commissioned to destroy America. The change
we expected in 2008 isn't the change we got. China can wipe out our entire
naval fleet in as little as 18 minutes it is said. Russia has EMP
(electromagnetic
pulse) weapons that can totally take out the entire United States power
grid
structure with a single bomb set off 20 miles above the earth. Cars/trucks
won't
run, your phones, computers and TVs won't work, transportation will come to
a standstill, chaos will develop rapidly because less
than 5% of our population
has food and water stored for even a week; without destroying a single
house.
See www.detailshere.com/preparednesstips.htm
for some stats on how well
prepared Americans are for disaster.
Hillary
is a threat to all humanity, a true warmonger when most of us just want peace.
Here's what she has to say:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EGBOMvBrZw
Why
would Hillary jeopardize us like that?
To complete the job of bringing in the new world order which the Bush's,
Clinton's,
and Obama administrations started. Please take the time to watch this short
video
all the way through. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8rMtIcVdk8
First
of all, understand the real Hillary is considered deceased by many. Her last
day of life was at the 911 memorial recently when she was literally thrown into
the
van following her seizures, failure to be able to walk up stairs on her own, and
other
instances of instability, head jerking, excessive laughing, showing lack of
bodily
control which were recorded and posted on youtube videos. What is
not known for sure is if the woman you have seen in the debates and on TV is
Hillary's double or a clone. A human adult clone can be made in as little as 90
days
using the original's DNA. But a clone needs time to program; maybe why Hillary
is
reading off a screen and using an earpiece to respond to questions during the
debates. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkiPZL4Qp5M
Videos of uneven length of ring and four fingers, mole placement, a
crooked front tooth that is no longer there, gross weight change, and lack
of
previous wrinkles on the newbie all tend to verify we are being duped.
Why?
Because the establishment and cabal need a Hillary in power to be able to
continue
raping the people and to establish their new world order. George Soros and
the
establishment don't really care if it is the real Hillary or not as they
control the strings;
whether it be Obama or Hillary or a Hillary look-a-like.
Who
they don't control is Trump. Trump is a serious threat to the cabal's way of
doing business. If you haven't noticed, there is virtually no difference between
establishment Republicans and establishment Democrats. The Republican party
establishment does not support Trump. Trump funds his own campaign using
his own money and donations to his campaign from the people like you and I.
His campaign does not receive money from the Republican party nor large
corporations or big pharma or foreign interests as Hillary's does. Don't you
think that is a bit strange? You ask why?
The reason is that virtually every establishment DC politician has been
compromised
by bribery, payoffs, sexual favors, or assassination threats. The FBI
didn't indict
Hillary over the Clinton Foundation (of which only 10% goes to charity -
the rest
into Clinton's pockets to cover favors due for the huge donations) because
over
90% of DC politicians are guilty of having their hands in the Clinton
Foundation
cookie jar including Obama. This also includes the judges. Hillary's pay
for play
game means foreign interests donate to Hillary and Bill's Clinton
Foundation in
trade for political and contractural favors.
What
about Benghazi and why they never sent help? Wikileaks released
Hillary's emails showing Hillary actually conspired to have Ambassador
Stevens
taken out. Stevens was sent to Benghazi in order to retrieve US made
Stinger
missiles supplied to Ansar al Sharia without Congressional oversight or
permission.
Hillary brokered the deal through Stevens and a private arms dealer named Marc
Turi. Then some of the shoulder fired missiles ended up in Afghanistan used
against
our own military. It was July 25th, 2012 when a Chinook helicopter was taken
down by
one of our own Stingers, but the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile and the
Chinook
didn't explode, but had to land anyway. An ordnance team recovered the serial
number
off the missile which led back to a cache of Stingers being kept in Qatar by the
CIA.
Obama and Hillary were now in full panic mode and Stevens was sent in to
retrieve
the rest of the Stingers. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which
explains the stand
down orders given to multiple commando teams. It was the State Dept (under
Hillary),
not the CIA that supplied them to our sworn enemies, because Gen Petraeus
wouldn't
supply these deadly weapons due to their potential use on commercial aircraft.
Then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus after he refused to testify that
he OK'd the BS talking points about a spontaneous uprising due to a Youtube
video.
Obama and Hillary committed treason...and THIS is what the investigation is all
about,
why she had a private server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and why
Obama,
two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was because of a Youtube
video, even though everyone knew it was not. Further...the Taliban knew that
this
administration aided and abetted the enemy without Congressional approval and
the Taliban began pushing the Obama Administration for the release of 5 Taliban
Generals. Bowe Bergdahl was just a pawn...everyone KNEW he was a traitor. So
we have a traitor and a POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised...and a
woman that is a serial liar, perjured herself multiple times at the hearing who
is
running for POTUS.
Wikileaks just released an email which proves that the
Saudi’s were the ones that
ordered Hillary to leave the men behind to die in Benghazi. Not
only did Hillary ‘lose’
$1,500,000,000 that was sent to Libya, she also got 4 servicemen killed after
she
abandoned them like a box of stillborn puppies, not to mention the thousands of
Libyans who died in the subsequent power vacuum. Only
the Dems, with their hands
out, and palms up, will support her. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft
was called
in...because the administration knew our enemies had Stingers.
Have
you picked up a copy of the supermarket tabloids The Enquirer or The Globe
this week? They ran 9 pages of dirt on Hillary given them by Mr Fix It, an
operative
hit man hired by the Clintons to clean up the messes they kept creating. A video
of
that can be seen at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLLAKUNBfkM
Hillary ordered him to destroy Bill's sex victims, pay hush money to
hookers, bribe
reporters to bury truth, ruin Monica Lewinsky, and clean up Hillary's sex
affairs as
a bisexual. Hillary and Bill do not have a normal husband/wife
relationship. Each is
free to pursue their pleasures with other people outside of the relationship;
polygamy
prevails. The tabloid exposee is in stark contrast to the Spokesmans
Review and
the Washington Post newspapers. Soros definitely controls those media
outlets;
which run nothign negative about Hillary but only find fault with Trump; how did
the
tabloid articles slip by?
When we were at the Spokane fair in Sept we were able to get a 6
month
Spokesman Review newspaper subscription delivered to our door for an out of
pocket cost of $1. Included with that was a free online subscription to the
Washington
Post. We discovered why. Never have I seen a more one sided "vote for
Hillary"
bias in my life than is portrayed in those two publications. Trump's right.
Media today
doesn't report the news anymore; it is a political propaganda machine only.
It
is dangerous to even know the Clintons or be associated as their friends.
The list
of suspicious deaths associated with the Clintons now exceeds 70 people,
including
the death of John F Kennedy Jr who was competing with Hillary for the senate
race
in New York. Foster was Hillary's beau who met with suspicious death also. I
received
a listing of all these people, who they were, and how they were associated with
the
Clintons some time ago. There were only 50 some back then, but the roster
has
increased now to 70. What about WACO, one of the deadliest law enforcement
operations in history which took 74 lives, where the people were subdued with
nerve
gas rendering them helpless and then burned alive as they couldn't move? The
evidence
is strong that the Clinton whitehouse was calling the shots. Janet Reno became
the fall
guy but Hillary played a prominent roll. Over what? What were those
Adventists doing
that they deserved to die such a horrible death?
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/10/hillary_clinton_and_the_chain_of_comm
and_at_waco.html#ixzz4O3l6UDA6
Have
you ever seen a Hillary bumper sticker or a Hillary lawn sign? I haven't. Trump
rallies turn people away for lack of room . Hillary pays to bus people to her
rallies to
try and show some kind of crowd attending them. We have to wonder why the media
is doing such a snowball job on us, John Q Public? Because the media is
bought
and paid for by the establishment. The establishment doesn't want to lose power
that rakes in the bucks for them. Trump will abolish their cash cows, their
system
of favoritism and pork barrel politics. This is the first time since Kennedy
they have
felt threatened and you saw what they did to him.
Sale
of our Uranium to Russia brokered by Hillary
Hillary Clinton's state department approved the sale of 20% of American Uranium
holdings to Russia while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million
back into
the Clinton Foundation. Why would we do that? So Russia could make plutonium out
of it and send it back to us inside an atomic weapon? Hillary has no
conscience,
no sense of doing what is right, no patriotism for her own country. We have just
put up with 8 years of that. Did we not learn our lesson?
Obama's entire cabinet is Muslim. Obama is a Muslim. He is trying to
import
Muslims into this country at a record pace. All these people don't work.
They are welfare
subsidized by our tax dollars. Many of us seniors try to just survive on
the $1000
or less we get with social security each month; yet these immigrants that
have not
gone through any immigration process or vetting to determine if they are
terrorists
or not, have no intention of assimilating into our society, and receive cars,
housing,
medical, food stamps, cellphones and benefits up to $4000/mo. I could live
real
well on $4000/mo. See William Mount's videos for a good one on this
issue. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=william+mount
This is compounded by the many wives and children each has. Hillary's
right
hand aid , Huma Abedin, is Muslim. She has absolutely undeniable ties to both
terrorists and those who funded the 9/11 attacks upon America.
Hillary will install Muslims in her cabinet also and continue bringing in many
thousands more of Islamic immigrants that will sap more money out of the US. She
has stated she intends to have a 500% increase in the rate Muslims are brought
into this country, all of which will be welfare supported. There are cities in
the US
presently which are almost 100% Muslim, like Dearborn, Michigan. Our laws are
not even enforceable there anymore.
Are Muslims and Islamic immigration a problem?
All Of A Sudden....Seven Short Years
Have Passed!"
Before Obama there was virtually no outlandish presence of Islam in America.
• All of a sudden, Islam is taught in schools. Christianity and the bible are banned in schools.
• All of a sudden we must allow prayer rugs everywhere and allow for Islamic prayer in schools, airports and businesses.
• All of a sudden we must stop serving pork in prisons.
• All of a sudden we are inundated with law suits by Muslims who are offended by American culture.
• All of a sudden we must allow burkas to be worn everywhere even though you have no idea who or what is covered up under them.
• All of a sudden Muslims are suing employers and refusing to do their jobs if they personally deem it conflicts with Sharia Law.
• All of a sudden the Attorney General of the United States vows to prosecute anyone who engages in "anti-Muslim speech".
• All of a sudden, Jihadists who engage in terrorism and openly admit they acted in the name of Islam and ISIS, are emphatically declared they are NOT Islamic by our leaders and/or their actions are determined NOT to be terrorism, but other nebulous terms like ‘workplace violence."
• All of a sudden, it becomes Policy that Secular Middle East dictators that were benign or friendly to the West, must be replaced by Islamists and the Muslim Brotherhood.
• All of a sudden our troops are withdrawn from Iraq and the middle east, giving rise to ISIS.
• All of a sudden, America has reduced its nuclear stockpiles to 1950 levels, as Obama’s stated goal of a nuke-free America by the time he leaves office continues uninterrupted.
• All of a sudden, a deal with Iran must be made at any cost, with a pathway to nuclear weapons and HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars handed over to fund their programs.
• All of a sudden America APOLOGIZES to Muslim states and sponsors of terror worldwide for acts of aggression, war and sabotage THEY perpetrate against our soldiers.
• All of a sudden, the American Navy is diminished to 1917 Pre-World War I levels of only 300 ships. The Army is at pre-1940 levels. The Air Force scraps 500 planes and planned to retire the use of the A-10 Thunderbolt close air support fighter. A further draw down of another 40,000 military personnel is in progress.
• All of a sudden half of our aircraft carriers are recalled for maintenance by Obama rendering the Atlantic unguarded, NONE are in the Middle East.
• All of a sudden Obama has to empty Guantanamo Bay of captured Jihadists and let them loose in Jihad-friendly Islamic states. He demands to close the facility.
• All of a sudden America will negotiate with terrorists and trade FIVE Taliban commanders for a deserter and Jihad sympathizer.
• All of a sudden there is no money for American poor, disabled veterans, jobless Americans, hungry Americans, or displaced Americans but there is endless money for Obama’s "Syrian refugee" resettlement programs.
• All of sudden there is an ammunition shortage in the USA.
• All of a sudden, the most important thing for Obama to do after a mass shooting by two Jihadists, is to disarm American Citizens.
* All of a sudden, the President of the United States cannot attend the Christian Funerals of a Supreme Court Justice and a former First Lady because of previous (seemingly unimportant) commitments.
* All of a sudden, our allies in Belgium lose 31 citizens with 100’s more injured and Obama goes to a baseball game and does the Wave.
*All of a sudden, we are two plus years into ISIS and we still do not have a strategy or a plan for defeating them.
*All of a sudden, we are more threatened than ever before in our history
... "By his fruits you will know him." And you want more of
this with Killary at the helm?
Speaking
of election rigging it has already started. I'm sure you've heard about
the 12 boxes of ballots found in a Chicago warehouse by a maintenance man, and
ALL ballots were a democratic ticket vote. Those boxes contained 2 million
votes
and they have already been counted. They have already been put into the system.
These ballots included dead people and illegal immigrants. William Mount talks
about this at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bz5MjYPUZQ
and at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJbeMund4XA.
He also covers how the
democratic party is bussing people around from district to district to vote
again
and again. Project Veritas , http://projectveritasaction.com
has documented in four
videos how all this voter fraud is being laid out. In the videos the democratic
heads
admit to doing this as they have done in the past elections.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEQvsK5w-jY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUBrZItwVy4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEo8yzByJqk
Obama lies to the American people in this video about voter fraud
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_G0u41zDh8Q&feature=youtu.be
Many
cases are being reported that the voting machines are changing the votes from
republican to democrat before the voter submits his ticket.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9-kcjvmmwg
Since George Soros is the
source of the voting machines, this is not surprising.
It may well be why Soros has guaranteed Hillary that she will
win the election.
http://www.naturalnews.com/055769_electoral_college_bribery_theft_of_pow
er.html#ixzz4O8xkDp45
EVERYBODY knows that Clinton has no chance in a fair election.
That's the
monkey in the room! Obama was hand picked by the globalists
and so is Hitlery
No such thing as voter fraud? This link begs to differ
http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/11/09/non-american-citizen-arrested-for-votin
g-in-texas-five-times-faces-up-to-20-years-272277
Gun control
Hillary is dead set on taking away your second amendment
rights. High on her agenda
is taking away your guns like they did in Australia. She says
that was a model program.
Well, what were the results of that program? Criminals will
still get their hands on weapons.
All restrictive laws regarding firearms do is ensure that
law-abiding citizens are rendered
defenseless and, in many cases, otherwise-law-abiding citizens
are forced to break the
law in order to arm themselves against criminals who wish to
do them harm. According
to the Australian government’s own statistics, the number of
serious crimes peaked in
the years after the ban. Manslaughter, sexual assault,
kidnapping, armed robbery, and
unarmed robbery all saw peaks in the years following the ban,
and most remain near or
above pre-ban rates. There are as many guns in the US as
there are people, about 390
million. No one has been more effective at arming Americans
than Obama has. The word
is out. In spit of all the false flag gun events staged by our
own government; think Sandy
Hook where no one really died and those kids have shown
up years later; to support
administrative gun confiscation. Taking our guns away would be
a near impossibility without
using foreign troops to do. Hunters and US gunowners
alone constitute the largest army
in the world. Armed Americans is why Japan never invaded
our homeland. You hear
about guns deaths in the newspapers but you DON'T hear about
the many many times
guns have stopped home invasions and store robberies and have
saved lives.
A little gun history
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control:
From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable
to defend themselves, were
rounded up and exterminated.
In 1911, Turkey established gun control:
From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend
themselves, were rounded
up and exterminated.
Germany established gun control in 1938:
From 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who
were unable to defend
themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
China established gun control in 1935:
From 1948 to 1952, 20
million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves,
were
rounded up and exterminated.
Guatemala established gun control in 1964:
From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend
themselves, were
rounded up and exterminated.
Uganda established gun control in 1970:
From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend
themselves, were rounded
up and exterminated.
Cambodia established gun control in 1956:
From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to
defend themselves,
were rounded up and exterminated.
In total 56 million defenseless people were rounded up and
exterminated in the
20th Century because of gun control. Hillary would like to add
to that number;
Trump supports second amendment rights. Kind of a no brainer.
Guns in the hands
of honest citizens save lives and property. Gun-control
laws adversely affect only
the law-abiding citizens. Criminals will always have guns,
regardless of laws.
With guns, we are 'citizens'; without them, we are 'subjects'.
Gun owners in the
USA represent the largest armed force in the World!
Catch the other side of the gun issue by subscribing (free) to
the site
http://www.usconcealedcarry.net
Besides being an excellent source of information
and offering excellent free videos to prepare you for
situations which may
require use of a gun, they even offer insurance with their
paid subscription
that protects you from lawsuits if you ever have to use your
weapon and
then defend yourself in court from those actions.
Hillary the liar
I copied a video from youtube not too long ago called
"Hillary tried to ban this video".
I went back to youtube to try and get the URL of that
particular video because it
was loaded with contradictory statements Hillary has made.
What I found was a
whole bunch of youtube videos where she has made contradictory
statements.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-xjiXfJ58Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53-1bUc4hPk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiVxClTiTvY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCej7EvgzVA
putting atomic weapons in ISIS hands
and there's lots more - go to www.youtube.com
and type in "Hillary tried to ban this video".
Hillary's character
Is this the person you want leading our country?
http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/top-36-hillary-f-bombs-flip-outs-and-eye-popping-tantrums/
Hillary's religious convictions?
Abandon God and follow the new world order
The Clinton Foundation -
the greatest charity fraud in history
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZMdbZuGTxA
The Hillary Clinton email server was merely a distraction from
the Clinton
Foundation and most of DC is in up to their necks in what
could be the
biggest scandal of all times. There are a lot of people
involved. This level
of corruption is something expected in a developing country or
a place like
China, where they openly persecute good people and have industrial
scale
organ harvesting of Falun Gong and others. The
Clinton Foundation is up to
their neck with Jiang’s vile regime in China, but there is
so much to see here.
Checklist of Hillary's
crimes at one whack
http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/checklist-of-hillarys-crimes-all-in-1-case/
Abortion - Pro Choice or Pro Life - right to live?
Trump says human life from the time of conception is precious.
He will work to reverse the Roe vs Wade decision which opened
up
the abortion business. The abortion business not only takes
human lives
but has become a factory for not only resale of organs and
body parts
but it is also claimed human remains are ending up in our fast
food
meat from both abortions as well as satanic ritual child
sacrifices. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY2Ua7TGtgk
Hillary is not pro life and says their lives can be taken
right up until the
time they come out the hatch and start breathing.
Have you ever seen
what happens during an abortion? A forceps is used to
literally dismember
the baby inside the womb and the parts are pulled out
one at a time; the legs,
the hands and arms, then the head is crushed and removed in
pieces also.
Do you really think the child doesn't feel this when being
torn apart?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESqdmQFTNhE
Make the right choice this
election.
Immigration and Free borders
We all know Hillary wants open borders and to have no control
of the
people who enter the US. Trump wants to build a southern
fence and
enforce immigration laws the current POTUS refuses to enforce.
The fence
isn't just for Hispanics, but for other nationalities (think
middle east, China)
trying to sneak in through Mexico and cause us harm.
Trump WILL enforce current border laws and start shipping the
illegal alien
troublemakers already here out. Do you have any idea what
illegal immigration
is costing us? It's currently at $338 billion a year. You can
find a good list at http://www.usillegalaliens.com/the_costs_of_illegal_immigration.html
Here's a short list:
1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on
welfare to illegal aliens each year by
state governments.
Verify At:
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8
2. $22 Billion dollars a year is spent on
food Assistance programs such
as food stamps,WIC, and free school
lunches for illegal aliens.
Verify At: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML
3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for
illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML
4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on Primary and
secondary school
education for children here illegally
and they cannot speak a word of English!
Verify At: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt...0.HTML
5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for Education for
the American-born
Children of illegal aliens, known as
Anchor babies, born in the US to illegal
alien parents
Verify At http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent on incarcerated
illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison Inmates are illegal
aliens.
Verify at: https://owa.slugger.com/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx
8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on Illegal aliens
for Welfare & social
Services by the American taxpayers.
Verify At: http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.HTML
9. $200 Billion dollars a
year in suppressed American wages are caused
by the illegal Aliens.
Verify At: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRI
10. In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in
remittances to their
Countries of origin.
Verify At: http://wwwrense.com/general75/niht.htm
11. The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration:
Nearly One million sex
crimes are committed By Illegal Immigrants In The United
States..
Verify At: http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml
The total cost is a whopping
$ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND IF YOU'RE LIKE ME, HAVING
TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY; IT IS
$338,300,000,000.00 WHICH
WOULD BE MORE THAN ENOUGH TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY FOR
THE
CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY.
Are we THAT Stupid? YES, FOR ALLOWING POTUS and
THOSE IN CONGRESS TO
GET AWAY WITH DOING THIS YEAR AFTER YEAR!!!!!
Obamacare?
Even Hillary's husband says this is the worst piece of
legislation to ever come
out of Washington. It was passed without anyone ever reading
what was in it.
How has that worked out for you as premiums skyrocketed,
deductibles climbed
out of sight, insurers are now few and far between, you really
didn't get to keep
your doctor, and next years premiums are scheduled to
increase by at least
25%. The only people that made out are the extreme poor.
The rest of us are penalized severely and even receive a
penalty on our tax
returns if we feel we cannot support such a system. Socialism
at it's best.
Here's a good explanation of
how Obamacare works. I’m
a 54 year old consulting For my girlfriend, the same exact policy, same deductible,
costs $1 per month. Don’t believe me? Just go to http://www.coveredca.gov/
, the ObamaCare So OK, clearly ObamaCare is a scheme that involves putting
the cost But there’s a lot more to it. Stick with me.
engineer and make between $60,000 and $125,000 per year,
depending on
how hard I work and whether or not there are work projects out
there for me.
My girlfriend is 61 and makes about $18,000 per year, working
as a part-time mail clerk.
For me, making $60,000 a year, under ObamaCare, the cheapest,
lowest grade
policy I can buy, which also happens to impose a $5,000
deductible, costs
$482 per month.
That’s right, $1 per month. I’m not making this up.
website for California and enter the parameters I’ve
mentioned above and
see for yourself. By the way, my zip code is 93940. You’ll
need to enter that.
burden of healthcare onto the middle and upper-income wage
earners.
Central California. We have a large land mass but just 426,000
residents -
about the population of Colorado Springs or the city of Omaha.
But we do have a large Hispanic population, including a
large number
of illegal aliens, and to serve this group we have Natividad
Medical Center,
a massive, Federally subsidized county medical complex that
takes up an
area about one-third the size of the Chrysler Corporation
automobile
assembly plant in Belvedere, Illinois (per Google Earth).
Natividad has state-of-the-art operating rooms, Computed
Tomography
and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, fully equipped, 24 hour
emergency
room, and much more.
If you have no insurance, if you’ve been in a drive-by
shooting or have
overdosed on crack cocaine, this is where you go. And it’s
essentially
free, because almost everyone who ends up in the ER is
uninsured.
Last year, 2,735 babies were born at Natividad. 32% of
these were born
to out-of-wedlock teenage mothers, 93% of which were Hispanic.
Less than 20% could demonstrate proof of citizenship, and
71% listed
their native language as Spanish. Of these 876 births, only 40
were
covered under any kind of private health insurance. The
taxpayers
paid for the other 836.
And in case you were wondering about the entire population
- all
2,735 births - less than 24% involved insured coverage or even
partial payment on behalf of the patient to the hospital in
exchange
for services. Keep this in mind as we move forward.
Now consider this: If I
want to upgrade my policy to a low-deductible
premium policy, such as what I had with my last employer, my
cost is
$886 per month.
But my girlfriend can upgrade her policy to the very same
level, for
just $4 per month.
That’s right, $4 per month. $48 per year for a
zero-deductible, premium
healthcare policy - the kind of thing you get when you work at
IBM (except
of course, IBM employees pay an average of $170 per month out
of
pocket for their coverage).
I mean, it’s bad enough that I will be forced to
subsidize the ObamaCare
scheme in the first place. But even if I agreed with the basic
scheme,
which of course I do not, I would never agree to subsidize
premium policies.
If I have to pay $482 a month for a budget policy, I sure
as heck do not
want the guy I’m subsidizing to get a better policy, for
less than 1% of
what I have to fork out each month for a low-end policy.
Why must I pay $482 per month for something the other guy gets for a dollar?
And why should the other guy get to buy an $886 policy for $4 a month?
Think about this: I have to pay $10,632 a year for the same
thing that
the other guy can get for $48.
$10,000 of net income is 60 days of full time work as an
engineer;
$48 is something I could make collecting aluminum cans and
plastic
bottles, one day a month.
Are you starting to get an idea what ObamaCare is really
about?
ObamaCare is not about dealing with inequities in the
healthcare system.
That’s just the cover story.
The real story is that it is a massive, political power grab.
Hillary wants to retain Obamacare with all its iniquities and
"tweak" it.
Trump wants to trash the whole thing and start over with
something
that is fair for everyone, not just the very poor and the
illegals.
Here's a few more tidbits about Obamacare I'll bet you
didn't know.
Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all
non-U.S.
residents, even if they are here illegally.
Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access
to
an individual’s bank account and will have the authority to
make
electronic fund transfers from those accounts.
Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the
government)
for all union members, union retirees and for community
organizations
(such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform
Now - ACORN).
Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section
will not
be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their right mind
come up with that?)
Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same
regardless of
specialty, and the government will set all doctors’ fees.
Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care
according
to the patient’s age. Above the age of 65 may be slower
treatment.
Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition
on
hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an
exception.
Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care
planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be
required
to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every
five years. (Death
counseling.)
Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which
doctors
can write an end-of-life order.
Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress.
No wonder they did not see the need to read it....doesn’t
apply to them!!!
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO STAND UP TO WASHINGTON.
I don’t know if we can do anything, but awareness helps.
Winds Of
Change — Warren Buffet is asking each addressee to forward
this
email to a minimum of twenty people on their address list; in
turn, ask
each of those to do likewise. At least 20 if you can. It has
to stop somewhere.
In three days, most people in The United States of America
will have this
message. This is one idea that really should be passed around!
Hillary had charge of health care under Bill's administration
and failed
to provide an equitable health care plan. She had 8 years of
working with
Obama to do the same and look what a mess that turned out to
be.
Do you really want a HillaryCare plan?
What about Trump?
Why do so many people dislike him? They think he is a
womanizer and a bully.
Even though Hillary tried to sandbag him on a grab ass
situation from ten years
ago and paid off other women to try and discredit him, many
other women whom
he has worked with over the years, came forward on their own
to state he was
always helpful and gentlemanly with them. Trump has a good
"normal" family
instead of a situation like Hillary where she is bisexual
herself and has to keep
covering up for her husband's sexual perversions in their
"polygamous" open
relationship. Are Hillary and Bill good roll models for your
kids? Trump is a very
successful businessman and I'm sure many have tried to take
advantage of him.
I do not doubt there have been instances where Trump refused
to pay people
in his business dealings. He's a tough bargainer and
that 's what we need when
dealing with trade agreements with other countries.
Last night a friend claimed that Donald Trump wouldn’t
make a good president;
he is brash, he is racist (that's one thing he is not), he is
a loudmouth; you know
the normal things people learn to recite after being
programmed by television
news. The one I loved was that, “Trump is arrogant.” My
friend questioned if
one man could make “that much difference in the world
today.” To my friend's
credit, she was respectful enough to let me respond when she
asked, “Really,
what has Trump done?”
In June of last year, Trump entered the race for president.
In just a little over
a year, Trump has single handedly defeated the Republican
party. He did so
thoroughly. In fact, he did so in such a resounding way that
the Republican
Party now suffers from an identity crisis. He literally
dismantled the party.
Trump even dismantled and dismissed the brand and value of the
Bush family.
Trump has Obama petrified that Trump will dismiss programs
that weren’t
properly installed using proper law. Trump will do away with
most if not all of
Obama's executive orders he bypassed Congress with.Trump has
single
handedly debunked and disemboweled any value of news media as
we knew
it—news now suffering from an all-time level of distrust and
disrespect.
Trump has leaders from all over the world talking about him,
whether good or
bad. Trust me, powerful men who have been president before
weren’t liked
by the global community. I doubt Mikhail Gorbachev liked
Reagan when
Reagan said, "Tear down that wall. "Trump has
expressly disclosed the
fraud perpetrated on the American public by Hillary Clinton.
He has, quite
literally, brought Hillary to her knees—if you believe that
nervous tension
and disorders offer physical side effects and damage. Trump
has unified
the silent majority in a way that should be patently
frightening to “liberals.”
As the press accuses Trump of being a house of cards, Trump
has proven
the press is the real house of cards. He has whipped up the
entire establishment
into pure panic. Trump has exposed them for who they are and
worse, what
they are. George Clooney was right when he said Trump draws
live news
coverage of his podium that he’s not yet approached. Thanks,
George, you
were perfectly correct. What we see as headline news today are
actually
the last bubbles from the ship that is now sunk—meaning the
standard
news media, as a propaganda machine, has been exposed. They
have no
more value. In the same way Trump asked the African-American
community
this question, I asked my friend, ”At this point, what do
you have to lose?”
We have mass cop shootings, riots in our streets, ambushed
cops, double
digit inflation, bombs blowing up in our cities, targeted
police, a BLM police state,
a skyrocketing jobless rate, no economic growth, privately
owned land being
seized by the federal government, the worst racial tension in
my lifetime,
no God in our schools, more abortions than ever, illegal
aliens pouring into
our country, sick veterans receiving no care, and a debt that
doubled in seven
years to $19 trillion. Are you really happy with
the condition of the current system?
One man has done all of this in
one year—one guy, and on his own dime. And
with everything I’ve written above, you believe Trump hasn't
done anything?
You claim that you are afraid of Donald Trump? No wonder
we’re in trouble.
You can say that Trump is a lousy presidential candidate.
That’s your right.
Just don’t ever say he’s not effective. That Megan Kelly,
FOX News, CNN,
MSNBC, Washington Post, Rachel Maddow, the Huffington Post,
the New York
Times, Raleigh’s News and Observer, the AP, Don Lemon, Jake
Tapper, and
many more, failed to implement their collectively orchestrated
lie on the
American people against Trump, is actually a massive testament
to Trump.
The press colluded pure propaganda to accomplish his demise
… and
they have collectively failed and miserably.
Here's just one example of how badly America is injured right
now. There
are high school football players on their knees during the
national anthem
simply because the press used as propaganda to program those
kids to
do that very thing. But, these kids are mimicking NFL stars
the same way
the same kids choose which brand of football shoe to
purchase—they're
overtly brain-washed to do that very thing. Now, we have a
generation of
children who hate America. America’s problem isn’t that
little children are
on their knee in collective disrespect of America. Our problem
is that America
is on her knee from collective disrespect by Americans. You
can disrespect
America all you want. But, it’s high-time you respect the
silent majority.
Because they’re not simply the “silent majority” as
you’ve been trained to
believe when Hillary calls them “deplorables.” The fact
is, they are simply
the majority. And now they're no longer silent either. Donald
Trump changed
all of that, single-handedly and within
one year."
I’ve heard too many say lately that we - the American
people - have no choice
in the upcoming November election!
Do you really think that God would leave us with no choice?
Come on people! Where’s your faith? He has heard our cries!
In defense of Donald Trump: Try to keep these points in mind:
Donald Trump did not steal your money.
Donald Trump did not raise your taxes.
Donald Trump did not quadruple the price of food.
Donald Trump is not starting a race war.
Donald Trump did not leave any US soldiers in Benghazi to be
slaughtered
and desecrated by Muslims.
Donald Trump did not send the US Navy to fight for Syrian Al-Qaeda.
Donald Trump did not arm ISIS and systematically exterminate
Christians throughout the Middle East.
Donald Trump did not betray Israel.
Donald Trump did not provide financing and technology to
Iran’s
nuclear weapons program.
Donald Trump did not give our military secrets to China.
Donald Trump did not remove our nuclear missile shield in
Poland at the behest of Russia.
Donald Trump did not shrivel our military, and betray our
veterans.
Donald Trump did not cripple our economy.
Donald Trump did not increase our debt to 20 trillion dollars.
Donald Trump did not ruin our credit, twice.
Donald Trump did not double African American unemployment.
Donald Trump did not increase welfare to a record level for
eight years.
Donald Trump did not set free muslim terrorists in Guantanamo
bay.
Donald Trump did not steal your rights, violate US
Constitutional law, or
commit treason hundreds of times.
Yet Trump is being ripped apart in the news, nonstop, while
Barrack
Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton and the criminals occupying our
government,
are not. The media IS the Democratic Party; Save our culture.
Stop listening to them!
We DO have a choice. Make the right one!
Michael Moore explains how Trump is going to bring jobs
back America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKeYbEOSqYc
God Bless
Buenos dias
Que Dios le bendiga
Ber
pathfinder@heavensfountain.com
There are enormous differences in the policy positions which these two
candidates embrace. Following is a comprehensive overview of exactly what their
positions and agendas are, with regard to the major issues confronting the United
States. In some instances, background information is provided in italicized print,
so as to place the candidates’ positions in proper context.
SYRIAN REFUGEES
CLINTON: To address “the worst refugee crisis since the end of World War
II,” Clinton has called for bringing some 65,000 refugees from Syria into the
United States as quickly as possible. This represents a 550% increase over
Barack Obama’s 2016 goal of 10,000 Syrian refugees, which Clinton describes
as merely a “good start.”
TRUMP: Pledging to suspend immigration from Syria and Libya,
Trump says: “We have no idea who these people are, where they come from.”
NOTE: ISIS has vowed to infiltrate the flow of Syrian refugees with its own terrorist operatives; more than 30,000 illegal immigrants from “countries of terrorist concern” entered the U.S. through its Southwestern border in 2015 alone; high-ranking government officials like FBI Director James Comey, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, CIA Director John Brennan, and FBI Deputy Assistant Director Michael Steinbach have all said that it is impossible to reliably screen out terrorists posing as refugees.
IMMIGRATION, AMNESTY, & BORDERS
CLINTON: Describing those who wish to enforce immigration law as “obstructionists” whose “backward-looking” mindset is “fundamentally un-American,” Clinton vows to “introduce comprehensive immigration reform with a pathway to full and equal citizenship” within her first 100 days in office. “My dream, she said in a 2013 speech to a Brazilian bank, “is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.”
Stating that “we have to go back to being a much less harsh and aggressive enforcer” of immigration laws, Clinton pledges to “go even further” than the two executive orders by which President Obama protected millions of illegal aliens from deportation in 2012 and 2014—even though Obama himself had previously said, on more than 20 occasions, that such executive orders would cross the boundaries of legitimate presidential authority.
TRUMP: Under Trump’s plan, immigrants seeking to enter the U.S. would be subject to an “extreme vetting” process that would include an “ideological certification” to ensure that those who are admitted “share our values,” “love our people,” and do not hold extremist views regarding honor killings, “radical Islam,” and “women and gays and minorities.”
Trump has also called for the construction of “an impenetrable physical wall on the southern border”; an end to “catch-and-release” programs whereby illegal border-crossers are set free rather than deported; and the termination of “President Obama’s two illegal executive amnesties.”
SANCTUARY CITIES
CLINTON: Clinton supports the “sanctuary” policies that bar police officers and other public-sector employees in some 340 U.S. cities from notifying the federal government about the presence of illegal aliens in their communities. Though sanctuary policies have turned many U.S. cities into very dangerous places, Clinton explains that without such arrangements, “people from the immigrant community … may not talk” to police who are trying to solve crimes there because “they think you’re also going to be enforcing the immigration laws.”
As Xochitl Hinojosa, a Clinton presidential campaign director, puts it: “Hillary Clinton believes that sanctuary cities can help further public safety, and she has defended those policies going back years.”
TRUMP: Trump has called the existence of sanctuary cities “an absolutely disgraceful situation,” and has pledged to “block funding” for such locales.
NOTE: Of the 9,295 deportable aliens who were released after their arrest in sanctuary jurisdictions during the first eight months of 2014 alone, some 2,320 were subsequently re-arrested, on new criminal charges, soon thereafter. And before their initial release, 58% of those 9,295 aliens already had felony charges or convictions on their records, while another 37% had serious prior misdemeanor charges.
THE SECOND AMENDMENT
CLINTON: Clinton has stated that crime victims should be allowed to sue firearm manufacturers who lawfully produce guns that are subsequently used in crimes. Such a policy would inevitably cause the firearms industry to disappear, and thus would eliminate the Second Amendment virtually overnight.
Clinton has denounced the Supreme Court’s “terrible” ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller, which held that people have a right to possess a firearm for lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home.
When Clinton was asked at a town hall meeting whether she would support a gun-buyback measure similar to the one where Australia had “managed to … take away … millions of handguns” in a single year, she replied: “I think it would be worth considering doing it on the national level, if that could be arranged.”
TRUMP: Trump’s position on the Second Amendment is as follows: “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon. Period.” Calling for strict enforcement of gun laws that are already on the books, and for the aggressive prosecution of violent criminals, he adds: “Empower law-abiding gun owners to defend themselves” because “law enforcement … can’t be everywhere all of the time.”
EXPANDING OBAMACARE AND PURSUING A SINGLE-PAYER SYSTEM
CLINTON: Clinton plans to “defend and expand the Affordable Care Act” (Obamacare), which has caused insurance premiums and policy deductibles nationwide to skyrocket while almost every Obamacare state exchange in the country has already gone bankrupt.
To address the failure and financial implosion of Obamacare, Clinton proposes to implement a “public option” — i.e., a government-run insurance plan that would “compete” with private insurers. Pacific Research Institute President Sally Pipes explains what this means: “By drawing on taxpayer dollars, this public option would be able to out-price almost every private insurer in the country. Unable to compete, private insurers would be 'crowded out,' leaving Americans with just one choice: a government-operated health care plan that brings the entire health sector under government control.”
This is precisely what Hillary Clinton wants. Indeed, her presidential campaign website candidly states that she “has never given up on the fight for universal coverage.”
TRUMP: Trump seeks to “repeal and replace Obamacare with Health Savings Accounts”; “establish high-risk pools to ensure access to coverage for individuals who have not maintained continuous coverage”; and “allow people to purchase insurance across state lines, in all 50 states, creating a dynamic market.”
NOTE: The empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of universal healthcare systems in countries around the world is clear. As the Cato Institute puts it: “In countries weighted heavily toward government control, people are most likely to face waiting lists, rationing, restrictions on physician choice, and other obstacles to care.”
HEALTH CARE FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS
CLINTON: Though illegal aliens do not qualify for coverage under Obamacare, the Clinton presidential campaign website says that “Hillary will expand access to affordable health care to families regardless of immigration status by allowing families to buy health insurance on the health exchanges regardless of their immigration status.”
TRUMP: Trump is opposed to permitting illegal aliens to qualify for coverage under Obamacare.
DEALING WITH ISIS & TERRORISM
CLINTON: The Clinton presidential campaign website calls for “taking out ISIS’s stronghold in Iraq and Syria by intensifying the current air campaign, stepping up support for local forces on the ground, and pursuing a diplomatic strategy to resolve Syria’s civil war and Iraq’s sectarian conflict….”
TRUMP: In September 2016, Trump said: “I am … going to convene my top generals and give them a simple instruction: They will have 30 days to submit to the Oval Office a plan for defeating ISIS.” In 2015, he stated: “ISIS is making a tremendous amount of money because they have certain oil camps, certain areas of oil that they took away. They have some in Syria, some in Iraq. I would bomb the s--- out of 'em…. That's right. I'd blow up the pipes.... I'd blow up every single inch. There would be nothing left.”
NOTE: ISIS, which evolved out of Al-Qaeda-in-Iraq, grew into the most powerful, well-funded terrorist organization in world history, precisely during Mrs. Clinton's watch as secretary of state. While ISIS launched its campaign of mass rapes, tortures, beheadings, and murders — and gained control over enormous portions of Iraq and Syria — Clinton and President Obama did absolutely nothing to thwart it.
THE SUPREME COURT
CLINTON: When Clinton was asked, in the second presidential debate of 2016, to articulate what would be her chief considerations for selecting nominees to the Supreme Court, she made no mention of fidelity to the Constitution. Instead, she stated that Justices should try to tip the proverbial scales of power, in favor of people who lack wealth and influence: “I want to appoint Supreme Court Justices who … actually understand what people are up against.” In the third presidential debate, Clinton reiterated that “the Supreme Court needs to stand on the side of the American people,” and “not on the side of the powerful corporations and the wealthy.”
In other words, Clinton prefers Justices who seek to enforce her particular vision of “social justice,” rather than blind, unbiased justice. Anyone whom she nominates will be an activist judge — in the mold of Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Breyer — whose foremost allegiance will be to left-wing ideology, not to the Constitution.
TRUMP: In the third presidential debate of 2016, Trump said the following about the types of Justices he would appoint to the Supreme Court: “They will interpret the Constitution the way the Founders wanted it interpreted, and I believe that’s very important. I don't think we should have Justices appointed that decide what they want to hear. It is all about the Constitution …”
OPPOSING VOTER ID LAWS
CLINTON: Clinton depicts Voter ID requirements as “voter suppression” efforts that are part of a racist scheme to “disproportionately [disenfranchise] African-Americans, Latino[s] and young voters.” Moreover, she says that calls for Voter ID laws are a form of “fear-mongering about a phantom epidemic of election fraud.”
TRUMP: Trump strongly favors Voter ID laws, saying: “It’s inconceivable that you don’t have to show identification in order to vote or that the identification doesn’t have to be somewhat foolproof…. If you don’t have voter ID, you can just keep voting and voting and voting.”
NOTES:
A 2012 report by the Pew Center on the States found that 24 million voter registrations—one-eighth of all registrations nationwide—were either invalid or inaccurate, including more than 1.8 million dead people who were still registered.
A 2014 study found that 35,570 people who had actually voted in North Carolina, had names and birth dates that matched those of voters who had cast ballots in other states.
A 2006 study found that in New York State, as many as 2,600 ballots were cast under the names of people who were dead.
In 2011, a Colorado study found that of the nearly 12,000 non-citizens who were illegally registered to vote in that state, about 5,000 had taken part in the 2010 general election.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the black voting rate in the 2012 elections surpassed the white voting rate by 2.1 percentage points. In fact, blacks voted at higher rates than whites even in states with strict voter ID laws in place, including Southern states like Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Georgia.
CALLING FOR AN INCREASE IN EARLY VOTING
CLINTON: “In an effort to reduce long lines and give more people with family or work obligations an opportunity to vote,” says the Clinton presidential campaign website, “Hillary will set a national standard for early voting, giving voters at least 20 days to vote in the evenings or on weekends before election day.”
TRUMP: No stated position.
NOTE: Logan Churchwell, spokesman for True the Vote, an organization that fights to preserve election integrity, puts this Clinton objective in proper perspective: “If you have enough time, you can get people to the polls. It’s not about ideas. It’s about moving bodies.”
SUPPORTING SAME-DAY VOTER REGISTRATION
CLINTON: Clinton supports same-day voter registration—which makes it impossible to determine the validity of a registrant's identity and eligibility—as a measure that would “mak[e] voting more convenient or more accessible.”
TRUMP: Trump opposes same-day voter registration because he says it makes it easier for non-citizens to vote.
VOTING RIGHTS FOR FELONS
CLINTON: The Clinton presidential campaign website says that convicted felons who “have paid their debts to society and have served their sentences”—and who, incidentally, vote for Democrats about 73% of the time— “should have the right to vote,” and that “Hillary will support legislation to make sure their voting rights are restored.”
TRUMP: Trump opposes voting rights for convicted felons.
NOTE: There are currently 10 states where convicted felons may permanently lose their right to vote. Those penalties were on the books when the felons committed their crimes. And part of paying “their debts to society,” in those states, is permanent disenfranchisement.
TAXES
CLINTON: Clinton calls for the imposition of a “fair share [tax] surcharge” on “the wealthiest Americans,” to “pay for ambitious, progressive investments in good-paying jobs, debt-free college, and other measures to strengthen growth … and reduce inequality.” All told, Clinton’s proposals call for tax hikes of $1.4 trillion over the next decade.
TRUMP: Trump seeks to “reduce taxes across-the-board.” His tax plan states: “If you are single and earn less than $25,000, or married and jointly earn less than $50,000, you will not owe any income tax…. All other Americans will get a simpler tax code with four brackets—0%, 10%, 20% and 25%—instead of the current seven. This new tax code eliminates the marriage penalty … while providing the lowest tax rate since before World War II.”
NOTE: Contrary to Clinton’s claim that high earners do not pay their “fair share” of taxes:
* The top 1% of American earners currently make 21.2% of all income, and pay 45.7% of all federal income taxes in the U.S.
* The top 5% of earners, who take in 32.3% of all income, pay 70% of federal income taxes.
* The top 20% of earners receive 60% of the nation’s income, and pay 95.2% of all federal income taxes.
THE “DEATH TAX”
CLINTON: Clinton's campaign platform emphasizes that “multi-million-dollar estates” must be compelled to pay “their fair share” of estate taxes, or so-called “death taxes.” Under current tax law, when a person dies, the first $5.45 million of his or her assets are not taxed when they are passed on to their heirs, but anything above that threshold is taxed at a rate of 40%. Clinton wants to impose a 45% tax on every dead person's assets above $3.5 million, rather than above the current $5.45 million figure. In addition, for people whose assets are significantly greater than $3.5 million, Clinton is calling for three additional brackets that would impose death-tax rates of 50%, 55%, and 65%.
TRUMP: The Trump tax plan says: “No family will have to pay the death tax. You earned and saved that money for your family, not the government. You paid taxes on it when you earned it.”
NOTE: The Clintons themselves have made arrangements to avoid estate taxes by creating residence trusts and shifting ownership of their multi-million-dollar New York house into those trusts.
CORPORATE TAXES
CLINTON: Clinton's presidential campaign website states that she intends to “close tax loopholes” that “reward companies for shifting profits and jobs overseas.” But Clinton refuses to consider lowering America's corporate taxes, which are currently the highest in the world.
TRUMP: The Trump tax plan says: “No business of any size … will pay more than 15% of their business income in taxes. This lower rate makes corporate inversions unnecessary by making America’s tax rate one of the best in the world.”
NOTE: The top federal corporate tax rate in the U.S. is approximately 35%, while the combined federal and state statutory corporate tax rate is 39.1% — higher than in any other developed nation on earth. American companies would be far less inclined to relocate overseas if the government would simply lower the corporate tax rate to a competitive level and thereby create a better business climate in this country.
THE MINIMUM WAGE
CLINTON: Asserting that “anyone who is willing to work hard should be able to find a job that pays well enough to support a family,” Clinton wants to raise the federal minimum wage from $7.25 per hour to $12 per hour immediately, and to $15 per hour “as quickly as possible” thereafter.
TRUMP: Trump has changed his position on this issue numerous times since August 2015, at which time he said that the federal minimum wage should remain unchanged. In November 2015, he said he would not be opposed to raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour. In April 2016, he said he was opposed to raising it. In May 2016, he said he was open to raising it, but did not specify by how much. Four days later, he said that each of the states should decide upon their own respective minimum-wage levels. And in July 2016, he called for raising the federal minimum wage to $10 per hour.
NOTE:
Clinton's professed concern with enabling workers to “support a family” lacks substance. Most minimum-wage workers are unmarried people younger than 25. Fewer than 20% of them have a family to support. Often they are high-school or college students trying only to earn some extra money, and 60% work only part-time.
Minimum-wage jobs serve chiefly as a vital bottom rung on the economic ladder for young people who have little or no prior work experience, and who lack the job skills that would command higher wages. If the cost of employing minimum-wage workers is made too high, employers will either terminate those workers; scale back the number of hours they work; hire more-experienced workers in order to increase the productivity they (the employers) receive in exchange for their extra financial outlay; or automate their business, allowing machines to do the work that minimum-wage employees used to perform. Consequently, unskilled-labor positions and starter jobs for young people are placed in jeopardy.
According to the Cato Institute, “Decades of research have shown that the minimum wage harms the least-skilled workers from poor families.” Similar results have been found repeatedly in studies conducted all over the world.
CLINTON’S SUPPORT FOR THE SAME ECONOMIC POLICIES THAT CAUSED THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS
CLINTON: On her presidential campaign website, Clinton pledges to “support families as they save for sustainable homeownership”; “support initiatives to match up to $10,000 in savings for a down payment for those who earn less than area median income”; and “reduce barriers to lending in underserved communities.”
TRUMP: No stated position.
NOTE:
Clinton’s policies bear a strong resemblance to those that led to the housing crisis and financial meltdown of 2008.
In 1977, Democrats passed, and president Jimmy Carter signed, the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), which was a mandate for banks to make special efforts to lend money to minority borrowers—particularly mortgagors—of meager to modest means. The goal was to help low-income minorities improve their economic condition through homeownership, on the premise that racism in the mortgage lending industry was the reason why the homeownership rates of blacks and Hispanics were lower than those of whites.
In the 1990s the Clinton administration—on the false and unfounded premise that mortgage lenders were discriminating against nonwhites—made the CRA's mandates much more burdensome. Moreover, the administration threatened to impose massive financial and legal penalties against banks that failed to comply with those mandates. This led to the proliferation of subprime mortgages—loans characterized by higher interest rates and less favorable terms in order to compensate lenders for the high credit risk they were incurring by loaning money to people with weak credit credentials.
These high-risk loans, along with additional government-imposed mandates affecting the mortgage-lending industry, caused the real-estate market to became a proverbial house of cards. “It was ultimately the skyrocketing rates of mortgage delinquencies and defaults,” writes Hoover Institution Fellow Thomas Sowell, “that were like heavy rain in the mountains that caused the flooding downstream.... Government was not passively inefficient. It was actively zealous in promoting risky mortgage lending practices.”
PLAN TO “EXPAND” SOCIAL SECURITY
CLINTON: “Committed to defending Social Security,” Hillary Clinton says that she will “expand the program, especially for caregivers and widows who currently don’t get what they deserve”; oppose “attempts to gamble seniors’ retirement security on the stock market through privatization”; oppose reductions in annual cost-of-living adjustments; and oppose efforts to raise the retirement age. Clinton says that she will be able to “preserve Social Security for decades to come” by “asking” the “wealthiest” and “most fortunate” to “contribute more.”
TRUMP: Trump says “we're going to save Social Security” not by raising taxes or by raising the age of eligibility, but rather, by creating a growing economy.
NOTE: The trustees of the Social Security Administration report that the Old-Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance funds—the major component of Social Security—is operating at an $84 billion annual deficit. They have predicted a cumulative cash deficit of $1.6 trillion from 2015 to 2026.
CALL FOR MASSIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING
CLINTON: Clinton pledges to spend $275 billion to “repair and expand our roads and bridges”; “moderniz[e] infrastructure like dams, levees, and wastewater systems”; and “invest in building world-class American airports and modernize our national airspace system.”
TRUMP: Trump says he wants to “at least double” the level of infrastructure spending proposed by Clinton, meaning that he aims to spend at least $550 billion.
NOTE:
Infrastructure spending has very little effect on overall employment. As the Heritage Foundation points out: “Infrastructure projects are capital intensive, not labor intensive. Road and bridge construction requires a relatively small number of highly skilled workers using advanced equipment and machinery.”
Even more important is the fact that every penny spent on infrastructure is money that has been taken out of the private economy and then laundered through an enormously inefficient, wasteful, and corrupt government bureaucracy. A 2010 Heritage Foundation report puts it in plain English: “Every dollar Congress injects into the economy must first be taxed or borrowed out of the economy. No new spending power is created. It is merely redistributed from one group of people to another.... Removing water from one end of a swimming pool and pouring it in the other end will not raise the overall water level. Similarly, taking dollars from one part of the economy and distributing it to another part of the economy will not expand the economy.”
$2 BILLION TO COMBAT THE “SCHOOL-TO-PRISON PIPELINE”
CLINTON: The Clinton presidential campaign website says that Hillary Clinton intends to spend $2 billion to “dismantle the school-to-prison pipeline,” a term connoting the allegedly common practice of using black students' behavioral problems as an excuse for pushing them out of the classroom and into the juvenile-justice system. According to Clinton, “overly harsh” methods of discipline “disproportionately affect African American students.”
TRUMP: No stated position.
NOTE: There is voluminous data indicating that differing rates of suspension and expulsion for blacks and whites are not due to race, but rather, are consistent with marked differences in actual schoolyard behavior.
SCHOOL VOUCHERS FOR POOR MINORITY CHILDREN
CLINTON: Clinton steadfastly opposes the implementation of school voucher programs, which would enable the parents of low-income, mostly-minority children who attend failing, inner-city public schools, to send their youngsters instead to private schools where they might actually have a chance of succeeding academically.
TRUMP: Trump wishes to reallocate $20 billion from existing federal spending and use it to create block grants for states to apply to tuition vouchers for private schools, charter schools, and magnet schools.
NOTE: Clinton's objectives are consistent with those of the public-sector teachers' unions, most notably the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). The chief goal of these unions is to maximize employment opportunities for their dues-paying members. And school vouchers siphon money (and member dues) away from the unions. This is hugely significant because large portions of the member dues, which constitute the very lifeblood of the unions, are spent on political support for the Democratic Party. The NEA and AFT together spent more than $330 million to influence elections in favor of Democrats from 2007-12.
“UNIVERSAL PRESCHOOL”
CLINTON: Stating that “every child deserves the same strong start” in life, Mrs. Clinton, citing the many “benefits” of preschool, wants to “make preschool universal” for young children by “doubl[ing] our investment in Early Head Start,” which covers kids from birth to age three.
TRUMP: No stated position.
NOTE: Two large-scale, federally funded studies concluded that Early Head Start programs have no lasting effects on children's social-emotional or academic development (in reading, vocabulary and arithmetic skills). The same record of failure can be seen in the regular Head Start program (for 3-4 year-olds), for which Clinton has likewise advocated billions of dollars in increased annual funding. Two scientifically rigorous, longitudinal studies commissioned by the government reported that Head Start has no measurable lasting impact on cognitive, social-emotional, or health-related variables.
CLINTON'S CALL FOR “FREE COLLEGE”
CLINTON: On the premise that “every student should have the option to graduate from a public college or university in their state without taking on any student debt,” Hillary Clinton says that “by 2021, families with income up to $125,000 will pay no tuition at in-state four-year public colleges and universities,” and “all community colleges will offer free tuition.”
TRUMP: Trump views Clinton’s plan for “free college” as a financially irresponsible course of action. He wants student loans to originate with banks, not with the federal government.
NOTE:
“Free college” does not mean that college professors, administrators, and staffers will suddenly start working for no pay. It means that American taxpayers will be forced to cover the massive costs.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, college graduates earn 68% more than people with only a high-school diploma. The eminent broadcaster and author Mark Levin, noting that about two-thirds of Americans never earn a college diploma, points out that there is no moral justification whatsoever for requiring those two-thirds of the population to pay the tuition costs of the one-third who do graduate from college, and who ultimately earn substantially more money than the two-thirds.
For decades, the major driver of skyrocketing tuition costs has been the fact that the federal government has assumed responsibility for covering most student-loan defaults. Knowing that taxpayers would pick up the tab for bad loans, lenders relaxed their standards and made money readily available at low interest rates—even to students with weak credit credentials. This led, predictably, to record levels of borrowing. Colleges and universities, reaping the windfall of this easy access to cash, had no incentive to keep their operating costs or tuition fees in check. Clinton’s plan, which increases government involvement even further, would inevitably cause tuition costs to rise to even higher levels.
PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION
CLINTON: On March 12, 2003, Clinton went to the Senate floor to speak out against legislation that proposed to ban the procedure commonly known as “partial-birth abortion”—where the abortionist maneuvers the baby into a breech (feet-first) delivery position, permits its entire body to exit the birth canal except for its head, and then uses scissors to puncture the baby's brain and kill it while the head is still inside the mother. Defending the legality of this procedure and condemning Republicans for trying to outlaw it, Clinton argued that any attempt “to criminalize a medical procedure” would compromise American liberty.
TRUMP: Trump views this late-term abortion procedure as “terrible” and “not acceptable.”
TAXPAYER FUNDING FOR ABORTION
CLINTON: For Hillary Clinton, abortion is a civil liberty that should be funded by taxpayer dollars. To Clinton’s delight, Planned Parenthood—America’s largest abortion provider — receives more than $520 million per year in government funding. Moreover, Clinton has vowed to repeal the Hyde Amendment, a 1976 law that has traditionally prohibited federal funding for abortions.
TRUMP: Trump has issued a call to make the Hyde Amendment a permanent law.
“CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM”
CLINTON: Clinton says that Americans everywhere “are crying out for criminal justice reform” because “families are being torn apart by excessive incarceration,” and “children are growing up in homes shattered by prison and poverty.”
TRUMP: Trump has been mostly silent on this issue. His position on criminal justice is essentially this: “Without law and order, you have a problem. And we need strong, swift and very fair law and order.”
NOTE:
* In 1990, when there were about 1.1 million prisoners in penitentiaries nationwide, there were 1.8 million violent crimes committed that year, including 23,440 murders.
* In 2014, when there were 2.2 million inmates in penitentiaries nationwide, a total of 1.2 million violent crimes were committed that year, including 14,249 murders.
* So, even as the population of the United States grew by 28% between 1990 and 2014, the incidence of violent crimes declined by one-third, and the incidence of murders fell by 39%.
These numbers suggest that putting more criminals in prison has helped to spare at least a million people per year from being victimized by violent crimes, and to save at least 9,000 people per year from being murdered.
CLINTON'S CALL TO RELEASE “NONVIOLENT” OFFENDERS
CLINTON: Asserting that “a significant percentage of the more than 2 million Americans incarcerated today are nonviolent offenders,” Clinton calls for “cutting mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug offenses in half.” “Excessive federal mandatory minimum sentences keep nonviolent drug offenders in prison for too long,” laments the Clinton presidential campaign website, “and have increased racial inequality in our criminal justice system.”
TRUMP: Trump has been critical of President Obama’s many commutations of drug offenders’ prison sentences, and he has referred to those offenders as “bad dudes” who should be behind bars.
NOTE: The Washington Examiner reports that “in the federal prison system, 99.5% of those incarcerated for drug convictions are guilty of serious trafficking offenses,” meaning that just 0.5% are in jail for simple possession. Drug trafficking hardly qualifies as a “nonviolent” offense. As the Examiner explains: “77% [of state drug inmates] re-offend within five years of release, with 25% committing violent offenses. Most of these convicted drug dealers are career criminals with long rap sheets.... Drug dealing is inseparable from violent victimization. Illegal drugs kill tens of thousands each year in overdose deaths. More die in violent acts and accidents under the influence of drugs.”
RACIAL PROPAGANDA & “VOTING RIGHTS”
CLINTON: “Hillary will fight to restore the portions of the Voting Rights Act [VRA] that were struck down by the Supreme Court,” says the Clinton presidential campaign website, “to make sure that all citizens enjoy the full protections they deserve — especially in states where they have been disproportionately targeted by laws that restrict voting access to the polls.”
TRUMP: No stated position.
NOTE: Clinton's suggestion that the Supreme Court somehow gutted a key piece of civil-rights legislation is untrue. In 2013 the Court did nothing more than strike down, as anachronistic, a VRA provision requiring mainly Southern states to undergo — based on the unfounded presumption of their continuing racist tendencies — special federal scrutiny before being permitted to change their election laws in any way (e.g., by instituting Voter ID requirements or reconfiguring their voting districts).
CLIMATE CHANGE
CLINTON: “Climate change is an urgent threat and a defining challenge of our time,” says the Clinton presidential campaign website. “It threatens our economy, our national security, and our children’s health and futures.” Specifically, Mrs. Clinton contends that the carbon emissions associated with human industrial activity are a major cause of potentially catastrophic “climate change,” and she has identified the reduction of such emissions as a major priority of her presidential campaign.
TRUMP: Trump has written: “There has been a big push to develop alternative forms of energy—so-called green energy—from renewable sources. That's a big mistake. To begin with, the whole push for renewable energy is being driven by the wrong motivation, the mistaken belief that global climate change is being caused by carbon emissions. If you don't buy that—and I don't—then what we have is really just an expensive way of making the tree-huggers feel good about themselves.” On his presidential campaign website, Trump says that his goal is to “make America energy independent, create millions of new jobs, and protect clean air and clean water.”
NOTE:
Clinton joins leading Democrats like John Kerry and Barack Obama, who contend that a consensus of “97% of scientists” believe that climate change is an urgent, man-made problem. But in fact, the 97% figure is a completely discredited fiction. As the Wall Street Journal explains: “[T]he so-called consensus comes from a handful of surveys and abstract-counting exercises that have been contradicted by more reliable research.... Surveys of meteorologists repeatedly find a majority oppose the alleged consensus. Only 39.5% of 1,854 American Meteorological Society members who responded to a survey in 2012 said man-made global warming is dangerous.”
* “Of the various petitions on global warming circulated for signatures by scientists,” says the Wall Street Journal, “the one by the Petition Project, a group of physicists and physical chemists based in [California], has by far the most signatures—more than 31,000 (more than 9,000 with a PhD).... The petition states that 'there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of … carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate.'”
* In late November 2009, the so-called “Climategate” scandal cast grave doubt on the intellectual integrity of those leading the effort to spread fear about the alleged dangers of manmade global warming. At the heart of the controversy was the discovery that a number of leading American and British climatologists who held that mankind's industrial activity was causing a dangerous warming trend in the earth's atmosphere, had intentionally manipulated the evidence in order to provide “proof” that their warnings were justified.
FIGHTING CLIMATE CHANGE WITH SOLAR PANELS
CLINTON: According to the Clinton presidential campaign website, the goal should be to “generate enough renewable energy to power every home in America, with half a billion solar panels installed by the end of Hillary’s first term.”
TRUMP: Trump says that past government investments in solar energy companies that subsequently went bankrupt have been “a disaster.”
NOTE: Between 2009 and 2012, the Obama administration spent some $90 billion of taxpayer money on “green energy” initiatives, most of which failed because they simply could not compete in the energy marketplace. This included, most famously, $535 million that was fast-tracked to the solar-panel company Solyndra, one of whose major investors was a billionaire donor and fundraiser for Obama. There were also many other federally funded “green energy” companies that received scores of millions, and sometimes hundreds of millions, of dollars in federal tax credits and grants during the Obama-Clinton years, and subsequently went bankrupt.
FRACKING
CLINTON: Clinton's position on hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is as follows: “I don’t support it when any locality or any state is against it.... I don’t support it when the release of methane or contamination of water is present. I don’t support it … unless we can require that anybody who fracks has to tell us exactly what chemicals they are using. So by the time we get through all of my conditions, I do not think there will be many places in America where fracking will continue to take place. And I think that’s the best approach, because right now, there are places where fracking is going on that are not sufficiently regulated.”
TRUMP: Trump is a longtime supporter of fracking, calling it a vital practice that “will lead to American energy independence.”
NOTE: A 2014 report by the Heritage Foundation succinctly summarizes the enormous economic and energy-related benefits that fracking has created, as well as the facts that are currently known about the safety of the fracking process:
“In just the last two years … fracking and horizontal drilling have increased U.S. energy production by an additional two million barrels of oil per day and the country is swimming in natural gas. This has directly lowered energy prices and indirectly produced significant cost savings by lowering manufacturing, transportation and other expenses. Economic opportunity created by the fracking revolution … ripples throughout the U.S. economy.…
“The recent [energy] boom has sparked some concern that fracking might contaminate drinking water, either through gas migration or through the chemical additives used in the injection process. Yet these fears have proved groundless. Companies have now fracked over one million wells in this country. Studies by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Groundwater Protection Council, and several independent agencies have found no evidence of groundwater contamination. It’s a remarkable safety record and a shining example of the efficacy of state-level regulation.”
THE “GENDER PAY GAP”
CLINTON: The Clinton presidential campaign website promises that Mrs. Clinton will “work to close the pay gap” that causes women to “earn less than men across our economy.” At issue is the claim, promoted by Clinton and many others, that for every dollar earned by men in the workforce, women of equivalent skills and experience earn only “77 cents.”
TRUMP: Trump believes that men and women deserve “equal pay for equal work,” but has not indicated that he believes that an inequitable gender pay gap exists.
NOTE:
The contention that women are underpaid by American employers in comparison to men is one of the most egregious, yet enduring, lies of our time. For one thing, equal-pay-for-equal-work has been explicitly mandated by U.S. law since 1963.
As the longtime employment lawyer Warren Farrell, who was a board member of the National Organization for Women from 1970-73, explains, the 23-cent “pay gap” is neither a result of gender bias nor workplace discrimination. It can be explained entirely by the fact that women as a group tend to make certain very logical and legitimate employment-related choices which, while affording them a number of benefits that they value highly, tend to suppress incomes—for reasons that are also logical and legitimate.
Most notably: Women are far more likely to leave the workforce for extended periods in order to attend to family-related matters such as raising children. During the course of their work lives, men accumulate an extra 5 to 9 years on the job as compared to their female counterparts, and each of those additional years translates to approximately 3 or 4 percent more in annual pay.
In addition, women, as compared to men, are much more likely to seek employment in fields that: are non-technical; feature a pleasant and safe working environment; offer desirable shifts or flexible working hours; require fewer working hours per week or fewer working days per year; and do not require long commutes or geographic relocation.
When all of the above variables are factored into the equation, the gender pay gap disappears entirely. That is, when men and women work at jobs where their titles, responsibilities, qualifications, and experience are equivalent, they are paid exactly the same.
Clinton's remarks regarding the gender pay gap are rendered even more ludicrous when one considers that by her own standards, she herself is guilty of underpaying the women employed in her own offices:
* During her time in the U.S. Senate, Mrs. Clinton paid the women employed in her office 72 cents for each dollar paid to their male counterparts.
* An even greater imbalance exists at the Clinton Foundation, where male executives earn 38% more than female executives.
CONCLUSION
A majority of American voters view both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump as candidates with significant personal flaws. But substantively, these are candidates who hold very different beliefs regarding the type of country the United States should be.
Digest and Decide. This was a bit long for a newsletter but I have literally hundreds of more articles and files and videos to bring you regarding this election. The election is truly a battle between those that have and those who are being trampled on. The big question is; can the people take time out from their texting and "the Simpsons" programs to truly understand what is at stake in this election. I hope so as this is truly a turning point in America; for better or for worse. Has Americans awakened enough to meet the challenge of a media driven bully - the elite, the establishment, the cabal? We will find out soon.
Please forward this email to as many as possible and/or refer them to
the page where this is posted www.heavensfountain.com/election.htm